SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mottur-Pilson, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mottur-Pilson, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Primary Care as Form or Content?

Christel Mottur-Pilson, Ph.D.

Internal Medicine Center to Advance Research and Education (IMCARE), Washington, D.C. 20006-1808

This article advocates revisiting the notion of primary care to include these dimensions: the physician-patient relationship, the notion of principal care, and the pa tient as validating the primary care relationship. The quality of primary care rests squarely on these three characteristics. From a systems perspective, the quality of primary care encompasses more than the right assort ment of clinical competencies; quality has to be grounded in and realized at the individual level where physician and patient meet and interact over time. The discussion thus rests on the assumption that primary care is a process of care rather than a collection of skills. This study was stimulated by two factors: the claim of subspecialists to at times provide primary care and L. H. Aiken et al.'s article on the contribution of specialists to primary care. The author of the present article surveyed 467 internists and subspecialists and asked if they equated principal care with general inter nal medicine (IM) care-a primary care competency. The percentage of IM in their practice was also surveyed. The 160 responses revealed that the percentage of sub- specialist care to primary care was similar to that de scribed in Aiken et al.'s article. The notion of principal care thus appears to better reflect the realities of clini cal practice.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 10, No. 4, 177-182 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9501000403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
C. Schraeder and T. Britt
Case Management Issues in Rural Long-Term Care Models
Journal of Applied Gerontology, December 1, 2001; 20(4): 458 - 470.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement