SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braun, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Zibrat, F. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braun, B. I.
Right arrow Articles by Zibrat, F. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Developing an Outcomes Measurement System: The Value of Testing

Barbara I. Braun, Ph.D.

Departments of Research and Evaluation Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations

Frank S. Zibrat, M.P.S.

Department of Indicator Measurement, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois 60181

Outcomes measurement systems often experience similar challenges to implementing data collection and demonstrating value. This article examines the experi ences of 451 hospitals participating in a 2-year research effort designed to assess the ability of participants to successfully implement collection of obstetric and peri- operative indicator data for development of an out comes measurement system. Measures of ability to implement include rate of attrition and reasons for withdrawal, resources expended, months of data trans mitted, internal factors that affected ability to opera tionalize data collection, and assessment of value of participating in the testing process. The findings indi cate considerable variation in implementation ability, challenges encountered, and satisfaction with the expe rience. Several changes in the operational system were made in response to the findings. Many of the lessons learned from the testing experience may be applicable to sponsors of and participants in other outcomes mea surement systems.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 11, No. 2, 57-67 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9601100202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
A. I. Riehle, L. S. Hanold, S. L. Sprenger, and J. M. Loeb
Specifying and Standardizing Performance Measures for Use at a National Level: Implications for Nursing-sensitive Care Performance Measures
Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2007; 64(2_suppl): 64S - 81S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
B. I. Braun, R. G. Koss, and J. M. Loeb
Integrating Performance Measure Data into the Joint Commission Accreditation Process
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1999; 22(3): 283 - 297.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement