SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pauly, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Even-Shoshan, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pauly, M. V.
Right arrow Articles by Even-Shoshan, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Hospital Outcomes from a Buyer's Perspective

Mark V. Pauly

Health Care Systems Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

David J. Brailer

Health Care Systems Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Gene Kroch

Department of Economics, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania

Orit Even-Shoshan

The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

This study reports lessons learned from a project to develop a flexible, generalizable, and valid method for corporate buyers of hospital care that would permit them to use available secondary data to rate the out comes quality of all hospitals in a local market area. As hospitalization insurance has moved from coverage that applied equally to all licensed hospitals to arrange ments which selected a certain preferred hospital or hospitals and rejected others, the need to determine the quality of different hospitals (as well as what they would cost the insurer or buyer) has become apparent. The product of this project was the development and demonstration of a set of rating methods that build on the strengths available in large hospital discharge data bases, such as (but by no means limited to) that of the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4). These measures, or others developed using these methods, deal with uncertainty in the data—its diagnosis and treatment—in a conceptually valid and practically useful way, illustrate a process that might be used in the general development of quality measures, and provide a useful critique of some other measures.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 11, No. 3, 112-122 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9601100302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. R. Longo, G. Land, W. Schramm, J. Fraas, B. Hoskins, and V. Howell
Consumer Reports in Health Care: Do They Make a Difference in Patient Care?
JAMA, November 19, 1997; 278(19): 1579 - 1584.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement