| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Measuring Quality of Care in a Psychiatric Hospital Using Artificial Neural NetworksAugusta Mental Institute, Augusta, Maine 04332
Augusta Mental Institute, Augusta, Maine 04332
Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine USA This study investigates a new method of measuring quality of care. Taking place at a tertiary psychiatric hos pital with 5,128 admissions from January 1989 through December 1995, this study uses artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and uses the standard deviation of LOS in a formula to measure quality of care, Q. ANNs are trained with data using unique patient identifiers and are compared with iden tical ANNs trained without these identifiers. These two types of ANNs make a LOS prediction, P, with a slightly different accuracies, and this fact is exploited in mea suring Q. The authors defined U as the standard devia tion of the difference between the actual and the predicted LOS of the ANNs with unique patient identi fiers, and defined G as the standard deviation of the dif ference between the actual and the predicted LOS of the ANNs without using these unique identifiers. Dividing U, the variation of individual LOS patterns intertwined with systemic LOS patterns, by G, the variation of pre dominately systemic LOS patterns, yields the ratio U/G, in which systemic effects are factored out leaving a mea sure of the average severity of patient illness. Ratios that exceed unity are seen in the patients who are more severely ill. The formula for quality of care, Q, divides the best LOS prediction accuracy, P, which is inversely pro portional to overall variation in the delivery system, by U/G, which is inversely proportional to quality of care, written as: Q = P/(U/G). Q reflects the patients' per spective because LOS is concrete and tangible to patients. The study took place during hospital downsizing (polit ical change), a consent decree (policy change), new administrative and medical personnel (staffing change), and the introduction of clozapine and risperidone for schizophrenia (therapeutic change). These events had a predominantly positive impact on Q. The value of Q cor related well with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO) triennial evalu ations. Some conclusions that emerged from this study: 1) System variation, reflected in the standard deviation of LOS, increased with frequent changes in top manage ment. 2) There was a clear-cut beneficial effect of cloza pine, and to a lesser extent of risperidone in schizophrenia, allowing more community placement. 3) With a dedicated professional staff quality of care can pre vail despite increasing variation in LOS (systemic prob lems). 4) The number of hospital employees per Q unit halved when the overall hospital Q ranged from low to high values as a result of policy and staffing improve ments, suggesting an increased efficiency of operation. 5) Q can be an objective outcome measure of quality care from the patients' perspective.
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 12, No. 1,
33-43 (1997) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
