SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Weech, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zinn, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Weech, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Quality Improvement in Nursing Care Facilities: Extent, Impetus, and Impact

Jacqueline S. Zinn

Department of Health Administration, School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Diane Brannon

Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Robert Weech

Department of Health Administration, School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

This study examines the extent, motivation, and per formance implications of formal quality improvement (QI) programs in Pennsylvania nursing care facilities. Responses to a 20-item survey sent to facility adminis trators indicate that continuous quality improve ment/total quality management (CQI/TQM) adopters are more motivated by quality of care and human resource concerns in implementing QI, more satisfied with the results of QI efforts, and more aware of a com petitive environment than are non-adopters. There are few differences between adopters and non-adopters with respect to organizational characteristics or per formance on quality of care measures. Comparison with the results of a study of QI implementation in hospitals reveals some differences in motivation, but similarities in satisfaction with results.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 12, No. 1, 51-61 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9701200110
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J Qual Health CareHome page
B. O. Kjos, G. Botten, and T. I. Romoren
Quality improvement in a publicly provided long-term care system: the case of Norway
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2008; 20(6): 433 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
R. H. Lee and L. Wendling
The Extent of Quality Improvement Activities in Nursing Homes
American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2004; 19(6): 255 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Advertisement