SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steinwachs, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steinwachs, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weiner, J. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Medicaid
*Personal Medical Records
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Ambulatory Medicaid Claims to Medical Records: A Reliabiligy Assessment

Donald M. Steinwachs, Ph.D.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Mary E. Stuart, Se.D.

University of Maryland at Baltimore County, Maryland

Sarah Scholle, Dr.P.H.

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Barbara Starfield, M.D.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Michael H. Fox, Sc.D.

University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

Jonathan P. Weiner, Dr.P.H.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

This study compares the documentation of ambulatory care visits and diagnoses in Medicaid paid claims and in medical records. Data were obtained from Maryland Medicaid's 1988 paid claims files for 2407 individuals who were continuously enrolled for the fiscal year, had at least one billed visit for one of six indicator conditions, and had received the majority of their care from one provider. The patients sampled were also stratified on the basis of the case-mix adjusted cost of their usual source of care. The medical records for these individuals as maintained by their usual source of care were abstracted by trained nurse reviewers to compare claims and record information. Linked claim and medical record data for sampled patients were used to calculate: (i) the percent of billed visits doc umented in the record, (ii) the percent of medical record visits where both the date and the diagnosis agreed with the claims data, and (iii) the ratio of medical record vis its to visits from billed claims. Included in the analysis were independent variables specifying place of residence, type and costliness of usual care source, level of patient utilization, and indicator condition on which patient was sampled. Ninety percent of the visits chronicled in the paid claims were documented in the medical record with 82% agreeing on both date and diagnosis. Compared to the med ical records kept by private physicians and community health centers, a significantly lower percent of hospital medical records agreed with the claims data. Total volume of visits was 2.6% higher in the medical records than in the claims. Claims data substantially understated visits in the medical record by 25% for low cost providers and by 41% for patients with low use rates (based on claims in formation). Conversely, medical records substantially un derstated billed visits by 19% for rural patients and by 10% for persons with high visit rates. Although Medicaid claims are relatively accurate and useful for examining av erage ambulatory use patterns, they are subject to signif icant biases when comparing subgroups of providers classified by case-mix adjusted cost and patients classi fied by utilization rates. Medicaid programs are using claims data for profiling and performance assessment need to un derstand the limitations of administrative data.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 13, No. 2, 63-69 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/106286069801300203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
B. D. Stein, J. N. Kogan, M. J. Sorbero, W. Thompson, and S. L. Hutchinson
Predictors of Timely Follow-Up Care Among Medicaid-Enrolled Adults After Psychiatric Hospitalization
Psychiatr Serv, December 1, 2007; 58(12): 1563 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. dosReis, P. L. Owens, K. B. Puccia, and P. J. Leaf
Multimodal Treatment for ADHD Among Youths in Three Medicaid Subgroups: Disabled, Foster Care, and Low Income
Psychiatr Serv, September 1, 2004; 55(9): 1041 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement