This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Miller, E. A. Articles by Chernew, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, E. A. Articles by Chernew, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Managed Care Medicaid Medicare Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Managed Care for Elderly People: A Compendium of Findings

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

William G. Weissert, Ph.D.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Michael Chernew, Ph.D.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Although managed care seems to serve well the in terests of non-elderly enrollees and their payers, elderly people face more risks. Chronic conditions, multiple prob lems, and more limited resources make them more vul nerable, whereas multiple payer sources make them more complicated to cover. This synthesis of managed care de livered in Medicare and Medicaid demonstration projects serving elderly beneficiaries shows that managed care plans either select or attract enrollees who suffer fewer frailties than those served in fee-for-service settings, ex hibit reluctance to enter rural markets, provide a broad range of elderly-specific services, offer more compre hensive coverage and services, and result in greater per ceived access problems, particularly for vulnerable subgroups. Plans operate more cheaply by using fewer resources, even after adjusting for case mix differences. Managed care enrollees tend to be more satisfied with financial and coverage aspects, whereas fee-for-service enrollees report higher satisfaction on other dimensions. In acute care settings, process of care findings were mixed, whereas clinical and self-reported outcome indi cators were no better and in some instances worse in managed care. Long-term care enrollees, in the few stud ies reported, consistently faired worse in both the processes and outcomes of care. These findings suggest that further research on the effects of managed care in its rapidly changing incarnations is needed, particularly with respect to how to improve the quality of acute and long-term care delivered to elderly people and the proper role of government and other key actors in the health care system.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 13, No. 3, 127-140 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/106286069801300304


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Miller and W. G. Weissert Strategies for Integrating Medicare and Medicaid: Design Features and Incentives Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2003; 60(2): 123 - 157. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. A. Fitzner, A. B. Bennett, H. Weinraub, and E. Heckinger Long-Term Care Models for Dually Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Populations Journal of Applied Gerontology, June 1, 2002; 21(2): 188 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. C. Rosenthal and C. Fox Access to Health Care for the Rural Elderly JAMA, October 25, 2000; 284(16): 2034 - 2036. [Full Text] [PDF]