American Journal of Medical Quality

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ajmq

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lowell, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lowell, W. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 14, No. 5, 216-228 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/106286069901400505

Using Artificial Neural Networks and the Gutenberg-Richter Power Law to "Rightsize" a Behavioral Health Care System

George E. Davis, MD

Augusta Mental Health Institute, Augusta, Maine, gedavis{at}saturn.caps.maine.edu

Walter E. Lowell, EdD

Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services, Augusta, Me

The authors propose a new paradigm for designing and managing behavioral health care systems by using artificial neural networks to measure quality of care (Q), using length-of-stay (LOS) prediction and the variation in LOS prediction, and subsequently using the variation of Q to obtain a measure of uncertainty in treatment. The paper proposes that mental illness is fractal in nature (self-similar at all scales) and conforms to power laws like the Gutenberg-Richter (G-R) law, whereby there is a log-log relationship between frequency of episodes (ie, admissions) and the severity of those episodes. The paper also hypothesizes that 28% is the average uncertainty (residual or excess entropy) in the treatment of mental illness. The authors use the G-R paradigm to calculate the severity of admission and, subsequently, the minimum number of beds for different behavioral health care facilities and propose the optimal partition of beds between community and state services, thereby "balancing" the delivery system. The data presented support the notion that mental illness manifests complexity and "self-organized criticality." The authors hypothesize that correcting deviations from the theoretical G-R curve for each level of care will allow optimum resource distribution, improve quality of care, and reduce costs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
G. E. Davis and W. E. Lowell
The Relationship Between the Fiscal Structure of Mental Health Care Systems and Cost
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 200 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
G. E. Davis and W. E. Lowell
Economic Grand Rounds: The Optimum Expenditure for State Hospitals and Its Relationship to the Suicide Rate
Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2002; 53(6): 675 - 678.
[Full Text] [PDF]