American Journal of Medical Quality

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weil, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weil, T. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 16, No. 1, 23-33 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060101600105

Commentary: Public Disclosure in the Health Field: Is There a Relevant Option?

Thomas P. Weil, PhD

Bedford Health Associates, Inc, Management Consultants for Health and Hospital Services, Asheville, NC, Tpweil{at}aol.com

Steadily increasing numbers of private, not-for-profit, and public agencies are releasing quality of care and financial information to enhance the market power of those purchasing America's health services. These sources range widely from the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) to the federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A growing interest in publicly disclosing performance information that concerns providers, as recently recommended by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on patient safety, until now has only achieved a modest impact. A major exception is in those metropolitan areas where acute-care facilities experience intense competition for patient admissions. Although the comparative quality and cost information currently available is for the most part in the public interest, it is concluded that, in the foreseeable future, these report cards as now structured will not result in any significant enhancement in access, improvement in quality, or reduction in cost. Options to encourage more public disclosure explored in this paper are Congress potentially passing legislation (a) to establish a Center for Patient Safety within the US Department of Health and Human Services as recommended by the recent Institute of IOM study, or (b) empowering the SEC beyond its current mandate to collect and disseminate all pertinent quality of care and cost information on every provider in the United States. The latter alternative would include user-friendly, comparative analyses to be provided on the Internet and else-where and would make readily available information from HEDIS, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO), coronary artery by-pass graft (CABG) surgery studies, cost comparisons based on Medicare cost reports and SEC filings, and other similar sources.

Key Words: Clinical outcomes • cost reduction • Health and Human Services Center for Patient Safety • health maintenance organizations • public disclosure • Securities and Exchange Commission


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
T. Gruber and B. Rudnitsky
Can We Be Certain of PRO Accuracy and Accountability? Inaccurate "Report Cards" Generated by Medicare Claims Data as a Marker for Laboratory Testing in Diabetic Patients
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 171 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Geiderman and G. L. Larkin
Commercial Filming of Patient Care Activities in Hospitals
JAMA, July 17, 2002; 288(3): 373 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
M. R. Bowers and C. I. Kiefe
Measuring Health Care Quality: Comparing and Contrasting the Medical and the Marketing Approaches
American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 136 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]