This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fanaeian, N. Articles by Merwin, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fanaeian, N. Articles by Merwin, E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Malpractice: Provider Risk or Consumer Protection?

University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind, Navid{at}alumni.Virginia.edu

Elizabeth Merwin, PhD, RN, FAAN

UVA Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA, and Director of the Southeastern Rural Mental Health Research Center

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) began operation in September 1990 as a clearinghouse for adverse action, licensure, and malpractice information in an effort to protect consumers and promote quality in heath care. This study analyzed 66,107 and 1291 records of payments made for 50,396 physicians and 1218 nurses, respectively, from 1994 through 1998, to describe characteristics, trends, and risk factors of malpractice payment for physicians and nurses. The median payments, more often settlements paid by insurance companies than judgments in courts of law, were higher for physicians than for nurses. Mean payments were higher for residents than for nonresident physicians; median payments for residents were slightly lower than other physicians when adjusted for number of providers included in the payment. On the state level, correlation analyses suggested a significant positive association between the nurse rate of malpractice payments that were made and median per capita income, number of physicians per 1000 residents, and number of attorneys per 1000 residents; analysis revealed a significant negative association between this rate and the percentage of residents residing in rural areas and the number of nurses per 1000 residents. Although findings suggested that payment trends remained stable, there was great regional variation in the risk of malpractice payment for both physicians and nurses. The physician risk ranged from a low of 0.73% per physician per year in Alabama to a high of 3.7% in Wyoming, and the nurse risk ranged from a low of 0% per nurse per year in Vermont to a high of 0.075% in the District of Columbia. If the quality of health care provided by physicians and nurses does not vary geographically in the United States, then such a great discrepancy seems to challenge the notion that the risk of malpractice litigation consistently promotes the quality of health care.

Key Words: Consumer • Malpractice payments • Medical malpractice • National Practitioner Data Bank • Nurses • Physicians • Quality • Residents • Risk factors • State level

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 16, No. 2, 43-57 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060101600202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Guirguis-Blake, G. E. Fryer, R. L. Phillips Jr, R. Szabat, and L. A. Green The US Medical Liability System: Evidence for Legislative Reform Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2006; 4(3): 240 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. B. Weeks, T. Foster, A. E. Wallace, and E. Stalhandske Tort Claims Analysis in the Veterans Health Administration for Quality Improvement J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2001; 29(3-4): 335 - 345. [PDF]