Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ostbye, T.
Right arrow Articles by Craighead, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ostbye, T.
Right arrow Articles by Craighead, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Health Services Utilization After Induced Abortions in Ontario: A Comparison Between Community Clinics and Hospitals

Truls Ostbye, MD, MPH, FFPHM

Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC

Elizabeth F. Wenghofer, MSc

Quality Management Division, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada

Christel A. Woodward, PhD, CPsych

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Gerald Gold, MD, FACMQ

Quality Management Division, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada

Joy Craighead, BScN, MEd

Quality Management Division, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada

The purpose of this study was to compare postabortion health services utilization of hospital abortion patients with community clinic abortion patients using administrative databases. The study was a retrospective cohort study. The study group consisted of patients with induced abortions (n = 41,039) performed in hospitals or community clinics recorded in the 1995 Ontario Health Insurance Plan claims (OHIP) database. An age-matched cohort of 39,220 women who did not undergo induced abortions was selected from the same data source to serve as controls. The main outcome measures were health services utilization indicators constructed from OHIP data within 3 months postabortion from office consultations, emergency room consultations, and hospital admissions. Hospitalization indicators were constructed from Canadian Institute for Health Information hospital discharge data with-in 3 months postabortion and included data on hospitalizations for infection, certain surgical events, or psychiatric problems. Postabortion health services utilization and hospitalization were higher in the patient population, regardless of service location, than in the age-matched cohort. Within the abortion patient population, hospital day-surgery patients had higher rates of postabortion utilization and hospitalization than did community clinic patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that hospital day surgery patients had a higher risk of subsequent post-abortion hospitalizations for infections (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-2.28), surgical events (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.30-3.24) and psychiatric problems (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.77-3.98) than community clinic patients. The rates of postabortion health services utilization and risk of hospitalization were lower in community clinic abortion patients than in hospital day-surgery patients. However, it is not possible to fully control for important confounding variables when using these administrative data.

Key Words: Abortion • community clinics • complications • data linkage • health services utilization • hospital admissions • Ontario

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 16, No. 3, 99-106 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060101600305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
L.L. deVeber and I. Gentles
Psychological aftermath of abortion
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 30, 2005; 173(5): 466 - 467.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
S. S. Singh and W. A. Fisher
Psychological aftermath of abortion
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 30, 2005; 173(5): 467 - 467.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement