SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNelis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNelis, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nathan, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Comparison of Predictive Outcomes of APACHE II and SAPS II in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit

John McNelis, MD

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Section of Critical Care/Metabolism, New Hyde Park, NY

Corrado Marini, MD

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Section of Critical Care/Metabolism, New Hyde Park, NY

Robert Kalimi, MD

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Section of Critical Care/Metabolism, New Hyde Park, NY

Antoni Jurkiewicz, MD

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Section of Critical Care/Metabolism, New Hyde Park, NY

Garry Ritter, PA

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Section of Critical Care/Metabolism, New Hyde Park, NY

Ira Nathan, PhD

Department of Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Section of Critical Care/Metabolism, New Hyde Park, NY

The Acute Physiologic Score and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and the Simplified Acute Physiologic Scale (SAPS) II are two of the more commonly employed predictors of outcome and performance in the intensive care unit setting. However, controversy persists about whether the scores generated by these systems have similar predictive value. This study compared the predicted mortalities derived from APACHE II and SAPS II and contrasted them to the actual mortality in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU). Data for 1665 patients admitted to the SICU between July 1994 and August 1997 were entered into an SICU computerized database. From recorded demographic, hemodynamic, and laboratory data, APACHE II and SAPS II scores were obtained with corresponding predicted mortalities. Patients were stratified by age into categories of less than and greater than 65 years old. Predicted mortalities by APACHE II and SAPS II were compared for each group. An additional analysis included a comparison of survivors and nonsurvivors. There was no significant difference in predicted mortality between APACHE II and SAPS II in any of the groups. Actual mortality was 30 of 486 (6.2%) in patients less than 65 years of age and 73 of 1179 (6.2%) in patients 65 years of age or greater. The APACHE II and SAPS LI predicted mortalities (mean ± SD) for patients less than 65 years of age were 10.5% ± 10.6% and 10.9% ± 13.3%, respectively (P > .05). The APACHE II and SAPS II predicted mortalities in patients 65 years of age or greater were 19.1% ± 17.8% and 18.7% ± 21.0%, respectively (P > .05). Similarly, when patients were stratified by survival status, no significant difference was present between groups. However, in individual patients, a difference between APACHE II and SAPS II scores was often present. We conclude that although disparities between APACHE II and SAPS II predicted mortalities in individual patients may be significant, APACHE II and SAPS II have similar predictive value in a large SICU patient population. However, both APACHE II and SAPS II systems overestimate mortality in SICU patients. Based on our results, we conclude that either system can be used to measure quality of care in the SICU; however, neither system can be reliably applied to a single patient.

Key Words: Acute Physiologic Score and Chronic Health Evaluation II • intensive care • outcome variables • predicted mortality • Simplified Acute Physiologic Scale II • surgical intensive care unit

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 16, No. 5, 161-165 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060101600503


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. A. Ensminger, I. J. Morales, S. G. Peters, M. T. Keegan, J. D. Finkielman, J. F. Lymp, and B. Afessa
The Hospital Mortality of Patients Admitted to the ICU on Weekends
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1292 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement