SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gruber, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rudnitsky, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gruber, T.
Right arrow Articles by Rudnitsky, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Can We Be Certain of PRO Accuracy and Accountability? Inaccurate "Report Cards" Generated by Medicare Claims Data as a Marker for Laboratory Testing in Diabetic Patients

Todd Gruber, MD, MPH

MCP, Hahnemann School of Medicine, and Medical Director, Long Branch Health Center, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, grudr{at}aol.com

Benjamin Rudnitsky, MD

PGY-II Medical Resident, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ

Quality of care attributed to individual physicians will be made public more frequently in the future. Inaccurate reports could damage physicians both professionally and financially. Using claims data for services rendered to Medicare patients from 1997 through 2000, The New Jersey Peer Review Organization (PRO) reported the percentage of each physician's patients who received testing for HgB Alc and for lipid profiles. We reviewed the patient records kept by these physicians to calculate the actual percentage of patients who received these tests. A statistically significant difference existed between the PRO's data and our results. Use of claims data as a marker for services provided can lead to inaccurate inferences about the quality of care provided by individual physicians, which can have potentially negative consequences to these providers.

Key Words: Billing • database • diabetes • Medicare • peer review organization • quality • report cards

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 17, No. 5, 171-174 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060201700502
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
F. Gianfrancesco, J. Pesa, R.-H. Wang, and H. Nasrallah
Assessment of antipsychotic-related risk of diabetes mellitus in a Medicaid psychosis population: Sensitivity to study design
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2006; 63(5): 431 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Advertisement