American Journal of Medical Quality

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ajmq

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneeweiss, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paeger, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schneeweiss, S.
Right arrow Articles by Paeger, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 18, No. 1, 3-9 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060301800102

Costs of Measuring Outcomes of Acute Hospital Care in a Longitudinal Outcomes Measurement System

Sebastian Schneeweiss, MD, ScD

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass, and the Outcomes Research Group, Bavarian Public Health Research Center, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Germany; Department of Medicine, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue (BLI-341), Boston, MA 02115 schneeweiss~post.harvard.edu

Astrid Manstetten, MA

Outcomes Research Group, Bavarian Public Health Research Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany

Manfred Wildner, MD, MPH

Outcomes Research Group, Bavarian Public Health Research Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany, and the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, Germany

Oliver Sangha, MD, MPH, ScD

Outcomes Research Group, Bavarian Public Health Research Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany, and the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany

Michael Liebetrau, MD

HELIOS Kliniken GmbH, Fulda, Germany

Axel Paeger, MD, MBA

ASKLEPIOS Kliniken GmbH, Lich, Germany

It is widely acknowledged that the measurement of outcomes of care and the comparison of outcomes over time within health care providers and risk-adjusted comparisons among providers are important parts of improving quality and cost-effectiveness of care. However, few studies have assessed the costs of measuring outcomes of care. We sought to evaluate the personnel and financial resources spent for a prospective assessment of outcomes of acute hospital care by health professionals in internal medicine. The study included 15 primary care hospitals participating in a longitudinal outcomes measurement program and 2005 patients over an assessment period with an average duration of 6 months. Each hospital project manager participated in a previously-tested structured 30-minute telephone interview. Outcome measures include time spent by the individual job titles in implementing and running the outcomes measurement program. Job-title-specific times were used to calculate costs from the hospitals' perspective. One-time costs (C2132 + 1352) and administrative costs (95 97 per week) varied substantially. Costs per patient were fairly stable at around 20. We estimated that the total cost for each hospital to assess outcomes of care for accreditation (10 tracer diagnoses over 6 months) would be 9700 and that continuous monitoring of outcomes (5 tracer diagnoses) would cost 12,400 per year. This study suggests that outcomes of acute hospital care can be assessed with limited resources and that standardized training programs would reduce variability in overall costs. This study should help hospital decision makers to estimate the necessary funding for outcomes measurement initiatives.

Key Words: Costs • measurement • outcomes research • quality of care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?