This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Krousel-Wood, M. A. Articles by Cortez, L. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Krousel-Wood, M. A. Articles by Cortez, L. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Diabetic Eye Problems Managed Care Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Application of the Combined Quality Improvement Ratio in the Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Activity in a Managed Care Organization

Ochsner Clinic Foundation, Division of Research, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121 mawood(ochsner.org

Richard B. Chambers, MSPH

Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA

Richard N. Re, MD

Division of Research, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA

Phyllis R. Nitzkin, BS, MBA

Medical Informatics, Ochsner Health Plan, Metairie, LA

Laurence M. Cortez, MD

Ochsner Health Plan, Metairie, LA

Assessing the impact of clinically relevant quality improvement activities (QIA) is important to managed care organizations; yet, turnover in enrollment can reduce the data available for analyses, thus decreasing the chance that a difference post-QIA will be detected. The Combined Quality Improvement Ratio (CQuIR) uses matching of patients into pairs pre-and post-QIA to systematically and validly increase the data included in the analysis for evaluation of the QIA. Using a paired cohort study design, 456 pairs of patients with diabetes were identified using the Health Plan Employer Data Information Set (HEDIS) specifications. Patients having retinal examinations were identified pre and post-QIA. The change in retinal examination rates was analyzed and results compared using repeated pairs (RP), matched pairs (MP), and combined pairs (CP). The CQuIR methodology (which uses CP = RP + MP) resulted in an increase in sample size (n = 456 [CPI versus n = 156 [RP] and n = 300 [MP]) and consequently an increase in power (0.92 [CP] versus 0.38 [RPI and 0.82 [MPI) and a decrease in the confidence interval range (0.97 [CP] versus 2.06 [RP] and 1.14 [MPI). The CQuIR uses a statistically valid approach to increase the data available for the evaluation of QLAs.

Key Words: Evaluation • managed care • quality improvement activity

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 18, No. 3, 117-121 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060301800305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?