SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hays, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Horne, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hays, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Horne, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patient Reports and Ratings of Individual Physicians: An Evaluation of the DoctorGuide and Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study Provider-Level Surveys

Ron D. Hays, PhD

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif and RAND, Santa Monica, Calif, hays{at}rand.org

Kelly Chong, MHA

RAND, Santa Monica, Calif

Julie Brown, BA

RAND, Santa Monica, Calif

Karen L. Spritzer, BS

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif

Kevin Horne, BS

NRC, Lincoln, Neb

The objective of this study was to compare physician-level survey instruments and estimate the number of patients needed per physician to provide reliable estimates of health care. The setting consisted of 3 health plans and 1 large physician group in the greater Cincinnati metro area. Surveys were mailed to patients of 100 primary care physicians. Patients were mailed either the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study(r) (CAHPS) or DoctorGuide survey instrument. A total of 4245 CAHPS surveys and 5519 DoctorGuide surveys were returned. Internal consistency reliability estimates for the multi-item scales (access to care, communication, and preventive care) for both surveys were adequate. The number of patient responses needed to obtain a reliability of 0.70 at the physician level for the access to care, communication, and preventive care scales were 32, 43, and 38, respectively, for the CAHPS survey and 26, 25, and 47, respectively, for the DoctorGuide survey. These results indicate similar and parallel psychometric performance for the DoctorGuide and CAHPS survey instruments.

Key Words: Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study • patient reports • physician assessment • ratings of health care • survey

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 18, No. 5, 190-196 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060301800503


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
H. P. Rodriguez, T. von Glahn, H. Chang, W. H. Rogers, and D. G. Safran
Measuring Patients' Experiences With Individual Specialist Physicians and Their Practices
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 35 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
R. G Evans, A. Edwards, S. Evans, B. Elwyn, and G. Elwyn
Assessing the practising physician using patient surveys: a systematic review of instruments and feedback methods
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2007; 24(2): 117 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement