This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Maio, V. Articles by Nash, D. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Maio, V. Articles by Nash, D. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Outpatient Quality Improvement in Academic Faculty Practice Plans: Does it Exist?

Department of Health Policy, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, vittorio.maio{at}jefferson.edu

Neil I. Goldfarb, BA

Department of Health Policy, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA

Mark Keroack, MD, MPH

Clinical Practice Advancement Center, University HealthSystem Consortium, Oak Brook, IL

Robert C. Browne, MPP

Group Practice, University HealthSystem Consortium, Oak Brook, IL

David B. Nash, MD, MBA

Department of Health Policy, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA

The purpose of this study was to (a) investigate the extent to which academic faculty practice plans (FPPs) are currently involved in ambulatory care quality improvement (QI), (b) describe the structure of QI initiatives at outpatient FPPs, and (c) delineate facilitators and barriers to development of FPP outpatient QI initiatives. Members of the Steering Committee of the Group Practice Council of the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC), representing the leadership of 88 FPPs, were asked to respond to a 38-item Web-based questionnaire during February and March 2003. The survey elicited information on the organizational characteristics of FPPs, their current degree of engagement in outpatient QI activities, and factors driving interest and barriers impeding efforts to conduct outpatient QI initiatives. Descriptive statistics for all variables of interest were performed. Responses were received from 33 participants believed to represent at least 28 of the total 88 FPP members of the UHC. Nearly all respondents indicated that some types of outpatient QI initiatives were currently taking place in their FPP. However, only 12% of respondents met 4 or more of the 6 criteria deemed to be essential to having a robust outpatient QI program. Among key QI indicators, one third of respondents reported that their FPP had a separate and distinct outpatient quality committee, and some one fifth had a budget for outpatient QI or financial incentives for outpatient clinics to engage in QI (or both). The majority of respondents stated that at least some departments in their FPP were collecting quality data. Most respondents reported that patient safety and external demand for outpatient QI were the "more important" factors driving QI efforts, whereas lack of human resources and other resources were the "more significant" barriers hindering QI initiatives. The results of the study suggest that, although FPPs showed a strong interest in outpatient QI initiatives, FPPs' efforts are still in an infancy phase and lag far behind inpatient performance measurement activities. Without appropriate resources, it appears unlikely that FPPs will be able to move the agenda forward to develop a quality culture and robust program of self-assessment and improvement in the outpatient setting.

Key Words: Academic faculty practice plan • ambulatory care • quality improvement

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 19, No. 6, 235-241 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060401900602


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. F. Leas, N. I. Goldfarb, R. C. Browne, M. Keroack, and D. B. Nash Ambulatory Quality Improvement in Academic Medical Centers: A Changing Landscape American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2009; 24(4): 287 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]