American Journal of Medical Quality

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ajmq

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BootsMiller, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Doebbeling, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BootsMiller, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Doebbeling, B. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 19, No. 6, 248-254 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/106286060401900604

Classifying the Effectiveness of Veterans Affairs Guideline Implementation Approaches

Bonnie J. BootsMiller, PhD

Iowa City Veterans Af-fairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA, bootsmillerb{at}lmail.medicine.uiowa.edu

Jon W. Yankey, MS

Iowa City Veterans Af-fairs Medical Center, Iowa City, IA

Stephen D. Flach, MD, PhD

Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA

Marcia M. Ward, PhD

Department of Health Management and Policy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Thomas E. Vaughn, PhD

Department of Health Management and Policy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Karl F. Welke, MD

Department of Surgery, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, LA

Bradley N. Doebbeling, MD, MSc

Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Regenstrief Institute, and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN

Hospitals use numerous guideline implementation approaches with varying success. Approaches have been classified as consistently, variably, or minimally effective, with multiple approaches being most effective. This project assesses the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) use of effective guideline implementation approaches. A survey of 123 VA quality managers assessed the approaches used to implement the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and major depressive disorder guidelines. Approaches were categorized based on their effectiveness, and the total number of approaches used was calculated. Commonly used approaches were clinical meetings, summaries, and revised forms. Consistently and minimally effective approaches were used most frequently. Most hospitals used 4P7 approaches. Odds ratios demonstrated that consistently effective approaches were paired with minimally and variably effective approaches. The frequent use of consistently effective approaches and multiple approaches benefits VA adherence. However, VA hospitals should consider selective combinations of approaches to ensure the use of the most effective implementation methods.

Key Words: Guideline implementation • practice guidelines • quality • United States Department of Veterans Affairs


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?