American Journal of Medical Quality

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ajmq

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spina, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spina, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 20, No. 1, 7-14 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860604273777
© 2005 American College of Medical Quality

Clinical Relevance of Automated Drug Alerts From the Perspective of Medical Providers

Jeffrey R. Spina, MD

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, jeffrey.spina{at}med.va.gov

Peter A. Glassman, MBBS, MSc

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; and RAND, Santa Monica, California

Pamela Belperio, PharmD, BCPS

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles, California

Rumi Cader, MD, MPH

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles, and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles

Steven Asch, MD, MPH

staff for Health Services Research at the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles, California, and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles

Primary Care Investigative Group of the VA Los Angeles Healthcare System

The authors used a real-time survey instrument and subsequent focus group among primary care clinicians at a large healthcare system to assess usefulness of automated drug alerts. Of 108 alerts encountered, 0.9% (n = 1) represented critical alerts, and 16% (n = 17) were significant drug interaction alerts. Sixty-one percent (n = 66) involved duplication of a medication or medication class. The rest (n = 24) involved topical medications, inhalers, or vaccines. Of the 84 potentially relevant alerts, providers classified 11% (9/84), or about 1 in 9, as useful. Drug interaction alerts were more often deemed useful than drug duplication alerts (44.4% versus 1.5%, P< .001). Focus group participants generally echoed these results when ranking the relevance of 15 selected alerts, although there was wide variance in ratings for individual alerts. Hence, a "smarter" system that utilizes a set of mandatory alerts while allowing providers to tailor use of other automated warnings may improve clinical relevance of drug alert systems.

Key Words: attitude of health personnel • clinical decision support systems • drug interactions • computer-assisted drug therapy • medication errors • prevention • control


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
R. Tamblyn, A. Huang, L. Taylor, Y. Kawasumi, G. Bartlett, R. Grad, A. Jacques, M. Dawes, M. Abrahamowicz, R. Perreault, et al.
A Randomized Trial of the Effectiveness of On-demand versus Computer-triggered Drug Decision Support in Primary Care
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 430 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
P. A. Glassman, P. Belperio, A. Lanto, B. Simon, R. Valuck, J. Sayers, and M. Lee
The Utility of Adding Retrospective Medication Profiling to Computerized Provider Order Entry in an Ambulatory Care Population
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2007; 14(4): 424 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
G. J. Kuperman, A. Bobb, T. H. Payne, A. J. Avery, T. K. Gandhi, G. Burns, D. C. Classen, and D. W. Bates
Medication-related Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry Systems: A Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 29 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
Y. Ko, J. Abarca, D. C. Malone, D. C. Dare, D. Geraets, A. Houranieh, W. N. Jones, W. P. Nichol, G. P. Schepers, and M. Wilhardt
Practitioners' Views on Computerized Drug-Drug Interaction Alerts in the VA System
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2007; 14(1): 56 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
H. van der Sijs, J. Aarts, A. Vulto, and M. Berg
Overriding of Drug Safety Alerts in Computerized Physician Order Entry
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2006; 13(2): 138 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]