| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/1062860604273777 © 2005 American College of Medical Quality Clinical Relevance of Automated Drug Alerts From the Perspective of Medical ProvidersVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, jeffrey.spina{at}med.va.gov
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles; and RAND, Santa Monica, California
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles, California
VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles, and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
staff for Health Services Research at the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System-West Los Angeles, California, and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Primary Care Investigative Group of the VA Los Angeles Healthcare System The authors used a real-time survey instrument and subsequent focus group among primary care clinicians at a large healthcare system to assess usefulness of automated drug alerts. Of 108 alerts encountered, 0.9% (n = 1) represented critical alerts, and 16% (n = 17) were significant drug interaction alerts. Sixty-one percent (n = 66) involved duplication of a medication or medication class. The rest (n = 24) involved topical medications, inhalers, or vaccines. Of the 84 potentially relevant alerts, providers classified 11% (9/84), or about 1 in 9, as useful. Drug interaction alerts were more often deemed useful than drug duplication alerts (44.4% versus 1.5%, P< .001). Focus group participants generally echoed these results when ranking the relevance of 15 selected alerts, although there was wide variance in ratings for individual alerts. Hence, a "smarter" system that utilizes a set of mandatory alerts while allowing providers to tailor use of other automated warnings may improve clinical relevance of drug alert systems.
Key Words: attitude of health personnel clinical decision support systems drug interactions computer-assisted drug therapy medication errors prevention control
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
