SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roumm, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nash, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roumm, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nash, D. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Health Care Provider Use of Private Sector Internal Error-Reporting Systems

Adam R. Roumm, MSPH

aroumm{at}cephalon.com

Christopher N. Sciamanna, MD, MPH

Department of Health Policy, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

David B. Nash, MD, MBA

Department of Health Policy, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The purpose of this study was to review the state of the art of private sector internal error-reporting systems and to begin to develop a classification system for comparing systems. Interviews were conducted to research and examine 9 systems currently on the market. Analysis resulted in the following observations: (1) 7 of the systems are stand-alone, while 2 are part of larger hospital information systems; (2) most of the systems have been in existence for less than 5 years; (3) acute care hospitals are the primary clients; (4) systems are capable of interfacing with other information systems and root-cause analysis programs; and (5) systems are browser based and accessible via the Internet and/or the provider’s intranet. Additional studies are needed to determine the impact of these systems on health outcomes. However, one fact is clear: tracking incidents will not improve patient safety unless administrators close the feedback loop on quality.

Key Words: medical error • adverse event • near miss • reporting • tracking

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 20, No. 6, 304-312 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860605281670
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
A. R. Paradis, V. T. Stewart, K. B. Bayley, A. Brown, and A. J. Bennett
Excess Cost and Length of Stay Associated With Voluntary Patient Safety Event Reports in Hospitals
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
J. R. Clarke, J. C. Lerner, and W. Marella
The Role for Leaders of Health Care Organizations in Patient Safety
American Journal of Medical Quality, October 1, 2007; 22(5): 311 - 318.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NeurologyHome page
R. G. Holloway, D. Tuttle, T. Baird, and W. K. Skelton
The safety of hospital stroke care
Neurology, February 20, 2007; 68(8): 550 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Advertisement