SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Crain, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, L. I.
Right arrow Articles by Crain, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Ambulatory Care Quality Measures for the 6 Aims From Administrative Data

Leif I. Solberg, MD

leif.i.solberg{at}healthpartners.com

Karen I. Engebretson, BA

JoAnn M. Sperl-Hillen, MD

Patrick J. O’Connor, MD, MPH

Mary C. Hroscikoski, MD

A. Lauren Crain, PhD

Pressure is building for performance measures that can be collected inexpensively and repeatedly for internal and external accountability and quality improvement. The objective of this study was to develop and test measures obtainable from administrative data covering each of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) 6 aims. Measure definitions were developed for 3 common chronic conditions and were revised after testing the feasibility of collecting them from claims data. The setting was a large, multispecialty medical group in the Midwest and included all adult patients with diabetes, coronary heart disease, or depression. Problems identified in the original 99 measures led to refinements or elimination. The resulting 46 measures ready for use include 11 measures for 5 aims applicable to most common chronic conditions, plus 10 to 14 effectiveness measures for each condition. They have been successfully used to describe care quality changes for these patients over time. This starter set for the 6 IOM aims should be tested and expanded by others.

Key Words: ambulatory care • chronic disease • data collection • insurance claim review • quality indicators • health care

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 21, No. 5, 310-316 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860606289071
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement