This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, J. Articles by Gurgiolo, T. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Anderson, J. Articles by Gurgiolo, T. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Determining Hospital Performance Based on Rank Ordering: Is It Appropriate?

Outcomes Measurement Resources, Mount Carmel Health, Columbus, Ohio, janderson{at}mchs.com

Mark Hackman, MD

Mount Carmel East Hospital, Columbus, Ohio

Jeff Burnich, MD

Mount Carmel East Hospital, Columbus, Ohio

Thomas R. Gurgiolo, MA

Outcomes Measurement Resources, Mount Carmel Health, Columbus, Ohio

An increasing number of "pay for performance" initiatives for hospitals and physicians ascribe performance by ranking hospitals or physicians on quality of care measures. Payment is subsequently based on where a hospital or physician ranks among peers. This study examines the variability of ranking hospitals on quality of care measures and its impact on comparing hospital performance. Variability in the ranks of 3 quality of care measures was examined: discharge instruction for congestive heart failure, use of beta-blockers at discharge for heart attack, and timing of initial antibiotic therapy within 4 hours of admission to the hospital for pneumonia. The data are available on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Web site as part of the Hospital Quality Alliance project. We found that considerable uncertainty exists in ranking of hospitals on these measures, which calls into question the use of rank ordering as a determinant of performance. (Am J Med Qual 2007;22:177-185)

Key Words: hospitals • quality • comparing • pay for performance

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 22, No. 3, 177-185 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860607300563


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Fong, G. M. Marsh, L. A. Stokan, Weilian Sang, C. Vinson, and L. Ruhl Hospital Quality Performance Report: An Application of Composite Scoring American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2008; 23(4): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF]