| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Challenges in Conducting a Hospital-Randomized Trial of an Educational Quality Improvement Intervention in Rural and Small Community HospitalsInstitute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas
Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System
Flying Buttress Associates, Charlottesville, Virginia
Community Health Institute, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospitals Council, Dallas, Texas
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospitals Council, Dallas, Texas
Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System
Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System
Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, Charlottesville, Virginia
Community Health Institute, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, Texas
Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System, dj.ballard{at}baylorhealth.edu
The study design for this hospital-randomized controlled trial of an educational quality improvement intervention in rural and small community hospitals, following the implementation of a Web-based quality benchmarking and case review tool, specified a control group and a rapid-cycle quality improvement education group of
Key Words: quality of care rural hospitals education rapid-cycle quality improvement
This version was published on November
1, 2008 American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 23, No. 6,
440-447 (2008) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
30 hospitals each. Of the 64 hospitals initially interested in participating, 7 could not produce the required quality data and 10 refused consent to randomization. Of the 23 hospitals randomized to the educational intervention, 16 completed the educational program, 1 attended the didactic sessions but did not complete the required quality improvement project, 3 enrolled in "make-up" sessions, and 3 were unable to attend. Of the 42 individuals who attended educational sessions, 5 (12%) have left their positions. Quality improvement interventions require several different approaches to engage participating organizations and should include plans to train new staff given the high turnover of health care quality improvement personnel. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23: 440-447) 