SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1062860609335971v1
24/5/412    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dodd, K. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dodd, K. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Qualitative Study of Consumers’ Views on Public Reporting of Health Care–Associated Infections

Kathleen M. Mazor, EdD

Meyers Primary Care Institute and the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, kathleen.mazor{at}umassmed.edu

Katherine S. Dodd, MPH

Meyers Primary Care Institute and the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester

Recent interest in publicly reporting health care–associated infections (HAIs) makes it important to develop reports that consumers can understand and evaluate. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 59 consumers. Interviews focused on responses to existing and prototypical reports and on recommendations for improvements. Many interviewees were unfamiliar with HAIs and were distressed to learn HAIs occur and can result in death. Public reporting was seen as unlikely to affect hospital choice; other factors were considered more influential. Interviewees recommended that reports be brief and include information on prevention as well as performance data. Additional recommendations on format and content were identified. For public reporting of HAIs to be successful, attention to report content and format are necessary. Consumer involvement can help to identify potential sources of confusion and methods of improving reporting.

Key Words: qualitative research • health care–associated infections • public reporting • nosocomial infections

This version was published on September 1, 2009

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 24, No. 5, 412-418 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860609335971


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement