SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Couch, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Couch, J. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Medical Care Value Purchasing: Medicolegal Promises, Pitfalls, and Progress

James B. Couch, M.D., J.D.

Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

Medical care value purchasing is the latest effort to promote cost containment while maintaining or enhancing the quality of medical care. The fuel driv ing this process is mandated health care cost and quality data disclosure to stimulate competition in oversupplied markets so that the highest quality and lowest cost providers achieve the greatest market share gains. States such as Pennsylvania, pursuant to Act 89, are in the vanguard of this national move ment, sometimes referred to as the "Buy Right Strat egy for Health Care Purchasing."

The measurement of provider quality and cost-ef fectiveness will become a "growth industry" in the 1990s. Medical paternalism will give way to con sumer activism in health care decision making. How ever, there are certain medicolegal pitfalls arising from the promises associated with mandated data disclosure concerning provider cost and quality effec tiveness.

One pitfall is that the unmeasurable quality attri butes (such as compassion and empathy) will fall into even greater disuse. Another pitfall may concern the further inflation of expectations of certain health care outcomes among consumers attending providers with the highest cost/quality ratings. Also, those pro viders losing patients will lose practical skills and any restraint they might have had from overutiliza tion on those few remaining fee-for-service patients left to them. All of these scenarios could result in increased litigation.

Despite these potential pitfalls, medical care value purchasing represents a real advance in promoting quality and cost-effectiveness. Regardless of the un derlying motivation, these two worthy goals should be sought with increasing vigor in the days ahead. The ultimate benefit may well be the rising to prom inence of the "laser-beam" (as opposed to the "shot gun") approach to clinical diagnosis in our academic medical centers and other health care institutions nationwide.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 3, No. 2, 32-36 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x8800300202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement