SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorian, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dorian, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Peer Review and You

Alan L. Dorian, M.D.

9 Maple Drive, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

A summary of the present status of peer review is presented with its implications dependent upon the awaited decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. The history of the Astoria Clinic and Dr. Patrick is detailed. Salient features of antitrust law are pointed out. Suggestions for a physician to follow if appointed to a peer review committee are detailed. The necessity for such review is summarized.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 3, No. 3, 84-87 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x8800300306
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement