This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nash, D. B. Articles by Kron, S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Nash, D. B. Articles by Kron, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Quality Assurance and Utilization Review in a Health Insuring Organization

The HealthPASS Example

University of Pennsylvania and HealthPASS

Philip Goldstein

University of Pennsylvania and HealthPASS

Samuel Kron

University of Pennsylvania and HealthPASS

HealthPASS is a Philadelphia-based health insur ance organization (HIO), owned and operated by the Penn Health Corporation, a subsidiary of Maxicare, the large for-profit health maintenance organization (HMO) company based in California. In a contractual agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare (DPW), Maxicare contracts primary care physician services on a capitated basis, and other services on a fee basis, to about 96,000 Medicaid enrollees in certain zip codes in Philadelphia. Al though HealthPASS does not provide care directly, it contracts with providers for these medical services. HealthPASS serves a primarily poor, minority, and inner city population with high rates of drug abuse, alcoholism, and mental illness. Currently, the enrol lees are served by a network of providers including more than 40 participating hospitals and over 500 primary care providers (PCPs) in the community. HealthPASS is unique as previous HIOs in Kentucky and Arizona both failed.

This paper describes the quality assurance and uti lization review (QA-UR) system implemented by HealthPASS with specific examples of case discus sions and a detailed look at the structure and function of the internal review process. Before outlining the QA-UR system, a brief history is provided of the recent controversial trend toward managed care for Medicaid recipients, as there have been marked fail ures in this arena nationally. The HealthPASS system is described—what it is, how it is staffed, who it serves, and the health services it offers. Discussion of the QA-UR system follows. Lastly, some of the thorny political issues that remain, such as the effort by HealthPASS to educate physicians about managed care, to develop protocols of care, and to coordinate QA-UR for so many physicians and hospitals, are examined.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 4, No. 2, 32-38 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x8900400202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?