SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hershey, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bontempo, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hershey, N.
Right arrow Articles by Bontempo, L. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Assessing Peer Review in the Quest for Improved Medical Services

Nathan Hershey

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

Lea C. Bontempo

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261

The increased concern about the quality of medical services evidenced by, inter alia, the growing atten tion to quality of Peer Review Organizations. the purchasing and implementation of sophisticated med ical data systems by hospitals, and the growing clamor from private health insurers and employers about the rapidly rising costs of health services has made determining the effectiveness of medical inter ventions a priority subject for many authorities in the field of medical care assessment. At the risk of over simplification, the view that a greater focus on qual ity of health services is overdue has begun to energize healthcare institutions, the health professions, pay ers, and the general public.

The objective of this paper and those that will fol low is to examine medical peer review. Medical peer review involves peer appraisal in at least two stages: in criteria and standard setting (1, 2), and in deter mining whether criteria and standards have been met by practitioners in the rendering of services (2). This first article describes some difficulties with the infor mation available to facilitate effective medical peer review, and examines the processes that provide the knowledge base upon which medical peer review de pends.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 4, No. 4, 94-100 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x8900400402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement