SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williamson, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessing Quality of Ambulatory Care A Comparative Analysis in Rural versus Tertiary General Medical Clinics

John W. Williamson

Salt Lake City Regional Medical Education Center

C. Steven Fehlauer

Salt Lake City Veterans Administration Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84148

Joanne Gaiennie

Salt Lake City Veterans Administration Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84148

Charles B. Smith

Salt Lake City Veterans Administration Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84148

The purpose of this study is to report the results and feasibility of a "multi-methods" assessment of ambulatory health care in both rural and tertiary care settings. Our method used an expert panel's assess ment of patient health and satisfaction outcomes (measured by follow-up telephone interviews) and care processes (measured by chart review) for assess ing complete episodes of care. Subjects consisted of a matched cohort of ambulatory adult patients from the above two settings. We identified and analyzed spe cific clinical errors to confirm the expert panel's judg ment of inadequacy. Results indicate that in both settings unacceptable health outcomes were found, at least partially explained by serious care deficiencies for 1 out of 2 to 3 patients seen. The problems, which involved mostly laboratory and pharmaceutic man agement, are probably preventable using newer edu cation and computer technologies. Our method, though dependent on adequate medical records, proved feasible in both the rural and tertiary ambu latory care settings studied.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 6, No. 1, 8-15 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x9100600103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement