This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schoen, M. H. Articles by Atchison, K. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schoen, M. H. Articles by Atchison, K. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Measurement of Dollar Value of Services in a Capitated Dental Plan

UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, California

Kathryn A. Atchison

UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, California

A number of attempts have been made to develop measures of the cost of resources expended to produce specific services that are more equitable than fees. Two conceptually different relative value methods (RVU and RTCU) and UCR fee-for-service were used to measure the dollar value of care produced in three consecutive years under a network-type capitation dental plan. While each yielded a different total, the values were relatively close in the first year. How ever, they diverged in the second and third years even when an inflation factor was kept constant for all three. In addition, the dollar value of specific services varied markedly over the three methods. The relative merits of the different systems are discussed, as well as possible reasons for the divergence. It is concluded that the RTCU system is preferable, but that great care must be taken to keep any system current, regardless of specific derivation.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 7, No. 2, 59-64 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713x9200700205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?