This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kapp, M. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kapp, M. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Legal Status of Clinical Practice Parameters: An Annotated Bibliography

Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio

An important recent development in American medicine has been the strong push in the last few years toward the formal creation, dissemination, and enforcement of explicit clinical practice guidelines or parameters relating to the quality and efficacy of various medical interventions, parameters that would guide the decisions and actions of physicians and other health care providers (1-3). Medical societies (4), governmental agencies such as the federal Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, and insurers are utilizing a variety of approaches to the develop ment of practice parameters for medical diagnosis and intervention, including informal consensus de velopment, formal consensus development, evidence- based guideline development, and explicit guideline development (5). The number and variety of practice parameters has burgeoned in response to the wide national variations in medical practice patterns, without corresponding differences in clinical out comes, that have been documented by health services researchers.

Several commentators have expressed serious skepticism about the probable impact of practice pa rameters, surmising that they will be used extensively in a negative manner in medical malpractice litiga tion (6, 7). Many physicians in particular have asked "how they [practice parameters] can be implemented without courting the ruin of the individual practi tioner" (8).

In response to these anxieties, a new medicolegal literature has arisen to address the relationship be tween the development of clinical practice parame ters and the physician's exposure to malpractice liti gation and adverse judgments, as well as the impli cations for malpractice insurance premiums. This growing literature has now achieved a critical mass. The major contributions to this corpus at present are listed and annotated below.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 8, No. 1, 24-27 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9300800106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. Kapp The Legal Status of Clinical Practice Parameters: An Updated Annotated Bibliography American Journal of Medical Quality, June 1, 1995; 10(2): 107 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. H. Woolf Practice Guidelines: A New Reality in Medicine: III. Impact on Patient Care Arch Intern Med, December 13, 1993; 153(23): 2646 - 2655. [Abstract] [PDF]