This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Zinn, J. S. Articles by Rosko, M. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zinn, J. S. Articles by Rosko, M. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Use of Standardized Indicators as Quality Improvement Tools: An Application in Pennsylvania Nursing Homes

Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

William E. Aaronson, Ph.D.

Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Michael D. Rosko, Ph.D.

Widener University, Chester, Pennsylvania

The Institute of Medicine recommends the use of key quality indicators (resident outcomes that suggest the presence of good or bad care) as tools for inter- facility comparison of the quality of care provided in nursing homes. In the spirit of this recommendation, the Health Care Financing Administration released selected results from its Medicare and Medicaid An nual Certification Survey to guide consumers in pur chasing nursing home services. However, because this information is published without adjustment for res ident characteristics that can influence the outcomes of nursing home care, its utility for policy-makers or consumers interested in variation in nursing home quality is limited. This research study utilizes federal and state survey data to evaluate variations in mor tality, pressure ulcers, urethral catheterization, and physical restraint use in 438 Medicare-certified skilled nursing care facilities in Pennsylvania. A standardization function adjusting for resident char acteristics known to influence outcomes is developed and estimated by ordinary least squares regression. Results suggest considerable variation in rates for these indicators across Pennsylvania nursing home facilities. Alternative uses for risk-adjusted key qual ity indicators as tools for improving nursing home quality and assisting potential consumers of nursing home care in making better informed choices are considered.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 8, No. 2, 72-78 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9300800209


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. T. Mullan and C. Harrington Nursing Home Deficiencies in the United States: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Research on Aging, September 1, 2001; 23(5): 503 - 531. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Harrington, H. Carrillo, J. Mullan, and J. H. Swan Nursing Facility Staffing in the States: The 1991 to 1995 Period Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 1998; 55(3): 334 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Moseley The Impact of Federal Regulations on Urethral Catheterization in Virginia Nursing Homes American Journal of Medical Quality, December 1, 1996; 11(4): 222 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Spiegel Letters to the Editor American Journal of Medical Quality, December 1, 1994; 9(4): 184 - 185. [PDF]

				F. Sainfort, J. D. Ramsay, P. L. Ferreira, and L. Mezghani A First Step in Total Quality Management of Nursing Facility Care: Development of an Empirical Causal Model of Structure, Process and Outcome Dimensions American Journal of Medical Quality, June 1, 1994; 9(2): 74 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]