| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Continuing Problems with Patient Self-DeterminationSaint Thomas Hospital and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, the first "right do die" case to be decided by the United States Supreme Court, constitutionalizes the principle of patient self-determination. The case encourages competent patients to reflect thoughtfully about the possibility that one day they may be inca pacitated just as Nancy Beth Cruzan was and to pre pare for that possibility by completing an advance directive. Furthermore, the recently enacted Patient Self-Determination Act requires hospitals to ask adult patients upon admission whether they have ad vance directives. However, a number of practical concerns arise for physicians about operationalizing these patient self-determination principles within their states and their scopes of practice. Will physi cians be prosecuted for "assisting suicides" if they withdraw feeding tubes or forgo other life-sustaining treatments? Will physicians be liable in medical mal practice for "undertreatment" or "overtreatment" in such cases? Will physicians be asked to violate their own moral codes in treating patients? Will others intrude into the traditional physician-patient rela tionship and decision-making process? Will physi cians be caught in the middle of troublesome family, staff, and institutional disputes? How will phy sicians learn of patients' advance directives? Will physicians be asked to continue care in futile cases? Will Cru zan's self-determination doctrine be improperly ex tended ? Successful implementation of patient self- determination principles will require consideration and discussion of these practical physician concerns.
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 8, No. 4,
187-193 (1993) |
|||
 |
|
|
 |
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
