SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
American Journal of Medical Quality
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedlieb, O. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedlieb, O. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Impact of Managed Care on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Report

Oskar P. Friedlieb, M.D., FACMQ

Health Risk Management, Inc., and The Institute for Healthcare Quality, Minneapolis, MN

Knowing when to use diagnostic testing and sur gery in the management of low back pain is often a dilemma for practitioners. This paper reviews the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines in man aging 1,796 cases of low back pain or herniated lum bar disk reviewed by Health Risk Management, Inc. between November 1990 and October 1991. In all cases (except cauda equina syndrome or other rapidly progressing neurological deficit) a trial of conserva tive treatment, always including physical therapy, was requested prior to recommendation for diagnos tic testing or surgery. Ninety-one percent (1,628 cases) had completed an adequate trial of conserva tive therapy or had a lesion requiring immediate in tervention. These cases were recommended for the requested procedure or hospitalization. Of the 168 cases that were not recommended immediately for imaging, surgery, or hospitalization, 84.5% improved with conservative management and neither imaging nor surgery was necessary over a period of at least 12 months following the time of review. Efficacy of conservative management was independent of age, sex, part of the country in which the treatment took place, and primary diagnosis. Net savings realized after subtracting employer costs for the reviews were well over a third of a million dollars in this small group of patients.

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 9, No. 1, 24-29 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/0885713X9400900105


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
D. E. Hoffmann
Pain Management and Palliative Care in the Era of Managed Care: Issues for Health Insurers
J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 1998; 26(4): 267 - 289.
[PDF]



Advertisement