This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1062860609332369v1 24/3/205    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McGuckin, M. Articles by Govednik, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McGuckin, M. Articles by Govednik, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hand Hygiene Compliance Rates in the United States—A One-Year Multicenter Collaborative Using Product/Volume Usage Measurement and Feedback

¹ McGuckin Methods International, Ardmore, PA; Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA
² University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Analytic Business Services, Huntingdon Valley, PA
³ McGuckin Methods International, Ardmore, PA; Analytic Business Services, Huntingdon Valley, PA

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mcguckin{at}hhreports.com.

	Abstract

Hand hygiene (HH) is the single most important factor in the prevention of health care-acquired infections. The 3 most frequently reported methods of measuring HH compliance are: (1) direct observation, (2) self-reporting by health care workers (HCWs), and (3) indirect calculation based on HH product usage. This article presents the results of a 12-month multicenter collaboration assessing HH compliance rates at US health care facilities by measuring product usage and providing feedback about HH compliance. Our results show that HH compliance at baseline was 26% for intensive care units (ICUs) and 36% for non-ICUs. After 12 months of measuring product usage and providing feedback, compliance increased to 37% for ICUs and 51% for non-ICUs. (ICU, P = .0119; non-ICU, P < .001). HH compliance in the United States can increase when monitoring is combined with feedback. However, HH still occurs at or below 50% compliance for both ICUs and non-ICUs. (Am J Med Qual XXXX;XX:xx-xx)

First published on March 30, 2009, doi:10.1177/1062860609332369

American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:205.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?