This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1062860609332510v1 24/3/229    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wu, N. Articles by Roy, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wu, N. Articles by Roy, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Nursing Homes Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Resident, Nursing Home, and State Factors Affecting the Reliability of Minimum Data Set Quality Measures

¹ Abt Bio-pharma Solutions, Inc., Lexington, MA
² Department of Community Health, Providence, RI
³ Geisinger Center for Health Research, Danville, PA

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Ning_Wu{at}abtassoc.com.

	Abstract

Nursing home quality measures impact policy decisions such as reimbursement or consumer choice. Quality indicators in the United States are collected through the federally mandated Minimum Data Set (MDS). Bias in MDS data collection or coding can thus have a negative impact on policy applications. To understand whether bias was present in coding, the authors studied 5174 pairs of MDS assessments that were independently collected by nursing home staff and study nurses from 206 nursing homes. The authors developed multivariate multilevel models to identify nursing home and resident characteristics that were significantly associated with the data quality of multiple MDS measures of nursing home quality. The outcomes were coding differences between nursing home staff and study nurses. Resident characteristics explained little of the variation in coding differences among facilities, while facilities characteristics explained 4% to 20% of the variation and state location further explained 13% to 34% of the variation. A generalized effect of nursing home state location tended to be consistent across measures. States that overidentified problems also tended to have worse quality indicators and vice versa. Comparisons of MDS-based quality indicators reflect differences in assessment practices at least as much as true quality differences. Efforts to standardize assessment practices across states are needed. (Am J Med Qual XXXX;XX:xx-xx)

First published on April 16, 2009, doi:10.1177/1062860609332510

American Journal of Medical Quality 2009;24:229.

A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?