|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 20, No. 3,
144-150 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860605275222
Conceptual Issues in the Design and Implementation of Pay-for-Quality Programs
Gary J. Young, PhD, JD
Center for Organization, Leadership and Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston University School of Public Health, health{at}bu.edu
Bert White, MBA, DMin
Boston University School of Public Health
James F. Burgess, Jr, PhD
Management Sciences Group, Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston University School of Public Health
Dan Berlowitz, MD
Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Boston University School of Public Health
Mark Meterko, PhD
Center for Organization, Leadership and Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs
Matthew R. Guldin
Boston University School of Public Health
Barbara G. Bokhour, PhD
Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Boston University School of Public Health
This article identifies and discusses key conceptual issues in designing and implementing pay-for-quality programs. Such programs offer financial incentives to providers for achieving predefined quality targets. The purpose of the article is to provide health care professionals with a framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating pay-for-quality programs. Examples are drawn from the Rewarding Results demonstration project for which the authors serve as the national evaluation team.
Key Words: quality financial incentives pay-for-performance payment methods

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Duckett, S. Daniels, M. Kamp, A. Stockwell, G. Walker, and M. Ward
Pay for performance in Australia: Queensland's new Clinical Practice Improvement Payment
J Health Serv Res Policy,
July 1, 2008;
13(3):
174 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Desai, A. M. Garber, and G. M. Chertow
Rise of Pay for Performance: Implications for Care of People with Chronic Kidney Disease
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
September 1, 2007;
2(5):
1087 - 1095.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. J. Young, M. Meterko, B. White, B. G. Bokhour, K. M. Sautter, D. Berlowitz, and J. F. Burgess Jr.
Physician Attitudes toward Pay-for-Quality Programs: Perspectives from the Front Line
Med Care Res Rev,
June 1, 2007;
64(3):
331 - 343.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. P. Casalino, A. Elster, A. Eisenberg, E. Lewis, J. Montgomery, and D. Ramos
Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?
Health Aff.,
May 1, 2007;
26(3):
w405 - w414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Grossbart
What's the Return? Assessing the Effect of "Pay-for-Performance" Initiatives on the Quality of Care Delivery
Med Care Res Rev,
February 1, 2006;
63(1_suppl):
29S - 48S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. G. Bokhour, J. F. Burgess Jr., J. M. Hook, B. White, D. Berlowitz, M. R. Guldin, M. Meterko, and G. J. Young
Incentive Implementation in Physician Practices: A Qualitative Study of Practice Executive Perspectives on Pay for Performance
Med Care Res Rev,
February 1, 2006;
63(1_suppl):
73S - 95S.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|