This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1062860607313141v1 23/2/90    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ettinger, W. H. Articles by Sussman, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ettinger, W. H. Articles by Sussman, A. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

When Things Go Wrong: The Impact of Being a Statistical Outlier in Publicly Reported Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality Data

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, ettingew{at}ummhc.org

Sharon M. Hylka, RN, MSN, CNA

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts

Robert A. Phillips, PhD, MD

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts

Lynn H. Harrison, Jr, MD

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts

Jay A. Cyr, MS, RN, MBA

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts

Andrew J. Sussman, MD, MBA

UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts

The public reporting of hospital quality and safety data is a growing phenomenon. Yet there are few reports of the effects of publicly reported data on individual organizations, particularly when the data show worse than expected performance. In this article, our hospital's response to having a mortality rate from coronary artery bypass graft surgery that was significantly higher than other programs in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is reported. The data caused suspension of elective cardiac surgery at the institution, and an independent review of the program was undertaken. The effects of the suspension and publication of mortality data on quality and patient safety, the residency training program in cardiothoracic surgery, and the financial performance of the hospital are described. Several lessons were learned that may be of value to other health care organizations that experience a public crisis in clinical quality. (Am J Med Qual 2008;23:90-95)

Key Words: cardiac surgery • performance improvement • public reporting • mortality rates

This version was published on April 1, 2008

American Journal of Medical Quality, Vol. 23, No. 2, 90-95 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1062860607313141


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. LINDENAUER Public reporting and pay-for-performance programs in perioperative medicine: Are they meeting their goals? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, November 1, 2009; 76(Suppl_4): S3 - S8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. E. Walsh, W. H. Ettinger, and R. A. Klugman Physician Quality Officer: A New Model for Engaging Physicians in Quality Improvement American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2009; 24(4): 295 - 301. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Popescu, R. M. Werner, M. S. Vaughan-Sarrazin, and P. Cram Characteristics and Outcomes of America's Lowest-Performing Hospitals: An Analysis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Hospital Care in the United States Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]